Possible New Rubric

I was just reading the current one and thought it was slightly imbalanced, so I quickly came up with this one. Feel free to ignore.

Ground Rules
Testees may use any tier deck they want, but if so, must warn the tester what tier they are, so that the tester can select a deck of equal strength(I'll put up a list of tiers later). Only TCG cards may be used. Decks such as FTK, Burn or Stall are not allowed to be used by both tester and testee, as they do not determine how much skill you have. The test will consist of a single match. Siding is allowed. Deck switching is not. Once the match is over, the deck must be sent by PM to the tester for analysis. Testers will not give other people this decklist. Testers will also do a 10 question ruling exam via pm. You must give reasons for all of your answers.

The Rubric

2 wins no loss: 20 points

2 wins 1 loss: 13 points

2 losses 1 win: 6 points

0 wins 2 losses: 0 points

Deck Construction: 0-20 points

Ruling Questions: Each ruling question correct is 2 points.

How well deck was used: 0-20 points

Deck Choice: 0-5 points (How much skill it takes to use the deck they choose, for example Fire Fist would be 2 points because it is fairly easy to use but decks like Infernity and Mono Mermail would be at the higher end in terms of points as they are harder to use.)

Misplays: <5 points (Subtract 1 point for each minor misplay, such as forgetting to mill with Lyla, like I always do xD. 2 points for a bigger one, such as making a huge combo play while the tester has tons of backrow. This score is allowed to end up as a negative.)

Total: 75-90 points: Advanced (Legend should be invite only, so people can always aim have something to aim for)

50-74 points: Intermediate

>49 points: Beginner

I like everything except points for deck construction. I do think that ruling questions points should be scaled.

Flying Pig wrote:I like everything except points for deck construction. I do think that ruling questions points should be scaled.

Why not deck construction? It's such an important aspect of the game.

Because it is too subjective.

Flying Pig wrote:Because it is too subjective.

But it is needed. We can't just miss out a crucial part of dueling.

Deck construction isn't subjective. There's bad cards and there's good cards.

And you have people like me who can't tell the differnece... Ok here's the deal. Those who want to will use this... if you guy agree on this. Then I'll just put my system in a spoiler and tell people I'll be using my system.

Flying Pig wrote:And you have people like me who can't tell the differnece... Ok here's the deal. Those who want to will use this... if you guy agree on this. Then I'll just put my system in a spoiler and tell people I'll be using my system.

Why don't you test them, and then send their deck picture to me or Acacia for us to give a score on.

Nah, I'll be a bad boy.